You are here

New Report Reveals Farm to Institution Trends in Food Distribution

This piece was originally posted by Erica Houskeeper on UVM Food Feed

A new research report from Farm to Institution New England (FINE) surveyed food distributors to gather their perspectives on institutional demand for local products and identify the challenges and opportunities they face in serving this segment of the food market.

The report—the first publication in a series of FINE research reports—is designed to help food system stakeholders understand the impact of institutional markets on New England’s food system. Titled, “Getting it There: The Role of New England Food Distributors in Providing Local Food to Institutions,” the report presents in-depth findings and makes specific, data-based recommendations for food distributors—including food hubs—as well as government officials, funders, and institutions.

report coverInstitutions are essential customers and are a really important market for New England distributors,” says Nessa Richman, New England Farm to Institution metrics project manager and collaborative development coordinator. “There are big differences in the role that institutions play in distributors’ businesses based on size. Specifically, those distributors with annual gross sales over $10 million are significantly more likely to sell to institutions.”

Richman pointed out that the two top barriers for distributors bringing local food to institutions were “consistent supply of local products” and “high price point of local products.” These barriers are very common across many surveys, she said.

“However, there were barriers that ranked slightly lower were less common, and perhaps represent lower-hanging fruit for those who want to make significant positive change in the food system. Specifically, nearly 30 percent of respondents cited ‘food safety and other certifications’ and ‘distribution inefficiencies with local producers’ as key challenges,” Richman adds. “Both of these barriers point to the need for distributors and producers to work together as partners to get more local food to institutions.”

The distributors who shared their input and unique perspectives ranged from small businesses to large companies. Together, they moved over a billion dollars of food in 2012, of which $366 million was sold to institutions. Nearly $60 million of these institutional sales consisted of locally produced food. Nearly 90 percent of these distributors said they believe that sales of local food to institutions will increase over the next three years.

Key findings:
  • In 2014, respondents served an average of 81 individual public schools, 45 colleges and universities, and 54 hospitals and health centers. Respondents procured local products from an average of 46 producers, two farmer cooperatives, and eight local value-added processors.
  • Respondents with gross sales greater than $10 million made a greater portion of their sales to institutions (58 percent) than respondents with gross sales under $1 million (28 percent) or respondents with gross sales between $1 million and $10 million (11 percent).
  • For the purposes of procuring and marketing their products, the most common definitions of “local” from respondents were products that were “produced within the state” (31 percent) or “produced within the region” (27 percent).
  • When asked to list the top local products where institutional customer demand was greater than supply, the most common response was that this was not an issue (33 percent). The second most common response was a lack of sufficient meat products (24 percent).
  • The two biggest obstacles for respondents in selling and procuring local products are the lack of consistent, year-round supply of local products (50 percent), and the high price point of local products for their customers (42 percent).
Looking Ahead

Richman hopes the study will create more opportunities for local sales by New England food distributors; promote policymaker support for proven programs and local tracking; encourage targeted investment that helps bring more local food to institutions; and inspire institutions to become advocates for local food and local food economies.

“I hope that New England’s schools, hospitals, colleges, universities, and other institutions will reach out to their distributors and ask them, ‘How can you help me buy more local food? How can you help me track and report on my local food purchases?’” Richman adds. “I hope they will start to understand that each one of their food and beverage contracts can be a tool to grow their local food program, better serve their clients, and strengthen their local economy.”

This series of research reports is designed to inform key decision-makers in the public, private, and nonprofit sectors about how they can help move regional farm to institution work forward. Later this year, FINE will publish two more in-depth research reports: “Local Food on Campuses: Higher Education’s Role in Farm to Institution,” featuring results from over 100 college and university dining services, and “Agricultural Producers & Farm to Institution Sales,” reporting findings from more than 225 New England farmers.

FINE is a six-state network of nonprofit, public, and private entities working collaboratively to achieve a mission of strengthening the food system by increasing the amount of New England-grown and processed food served in our region’s institutions.

Learn more by downloading the full report: www.farmtoinstitution.org/distributor-report

 

Erica Houskeeper is a freelance writer, and public relations/communications consultant. She covers food systems and farmer training for the University of Vermont, and writes about exploring Vermont on her  blog, www.happyvermont.com.  Erica worked for Boston University before returning to Vermont in 2006, and served as director of communications for the Vermont Department of Tourism and Marketing for five years.  She manages PR for the annual UVM Food Systems Summit in June.